[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151001150735.GH6963@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:07:35 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, will.deacon@....com, dave.long@...aro.org,
panand@...hat.com, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_break_hook
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 03:59:04PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> index cebf786..eb520d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
> @@ -292,11 +292,11 @@ static int call_break_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> struct break_hook *hook;
> int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr) = NULL;
>
> - read_lock(&break_hook_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry(hook, &break_hook, node)
> if ((esr & hook->esr_mask) == hook->esr_val)
> fn = hook->fn;
> - read_unlock(&break_hook_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return fn ? fn(regs, esr) : DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
> }
That's not enough, you also need list_(add|del)_rcu where the list is
modified, together with list_for_each_entry_rcu() here.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists