[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151004000009.GA10997@gate.crashing.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 19:00:09 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@...t.ibm.com>
Cc: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 09:24:46PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > > Ok, than we can just zero out r5 for example and use it in tlbie as RS,
> > > right?
> >
> > That won't assemble _unless_ your assembler is in POWER7 mode. It also
> > won't do the right thing at run time on older machines.
>
> Correct, getting this to work on both pre-power7 and power7 and later
> is tricky. One really horrible hack would be to do:
>
> li r0,0
> tlbie r4,0
>
> On pre-power7, the "0" will be taken as a zero L operand and on
> power7 and later, it'll be r0, but with a zero value we loaded in
> the insn before. I know, really ugly. :-)
Hide the "li 0,0" somewhere earlier, and write it as "tlbie 4,0", and
don't write a comment -- we *like* tricky!
It should really be a separate macro define for power7 and 4xx etc.;
and the macro should not be called "tlbia", but something that makes
it obvious at the usage sites that it is in fact a macro; and why a
macro anyway, a function call might be better here?
Segher
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists