[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAnmVRRLUMqKQgiu5qLPadoc7euYTPRzmavjeiHfC_kcPj2Q5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:27:09 -0700
From: Anish Bhatt <anish@...ech.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org, jikos@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] zlib : Fix usage example of zlib_adler32()
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:23:58 -0700 Anish Bhatt <anish@...ech.edu> wrote:
>
>> alder32 was renamed to zlib_adler32 since before 2.6.11, update
>> the example accordingly. This code does not seem to have an
>> assigned maintainer.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/zutil.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/zutil.h
>> @@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ typedef uLong (*check_func) (uLong check, const Byte *buf,
>> An Adler-32 checksum is almost as reliable as a CRC32 but can be computed
>> much faster. Usage example:
>>
>> - uLong adler = adler32(0L, NULL, 0);
>> + uLong adler = zlib_adler32(0L, NULL, 0);
>>
>> while (read_buffer(buffer, length) != EOF) {
>> - adler = adler32(adler, buffer, length);
>> + adler = zlib_adler32(adler, buffer, length);
>> }
>> if (adler != original_adler) error();
>> */
>
> I applied this September 15. You should have received the commit
> email on that date. I'm not a spammer, honest.
That is weird, I don't see a notification in the spam folder either, but I do
see that the code has changed. Sorry about the noise.
-Anish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists