linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZEv8V1+qv4zzKkzicZhXsziWbePJbgO8ziCWRhh_tR9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:20:45 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
	"Puustinen, Ismo" <ismo.puustinen@...el.com>,
	"Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> The patches 7 and 8 are pretty independent, though they don't make much sense
> without previous ones applied.

To me it seems patches 5 & 6 (GPIO patches) can be applied as-is
to my GPIO tree without any bad side effects. Is this correct?

In that case I will apply them.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/