| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:28:53 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...el.com>, "Puustinen, Ismo" <ismo.puustinen@...el.com>, "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 09:20 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote: > > > The patches 7 and 8 are pretty independent, though they don't make > > much sense > > without previous ones applied. > > To me it seems patches 5 & 6 (GPIO patches) can be applied as-is > to my GPIO tree without any bad side effects. Is this correct? Yes, that's correct. > > In that case I will apply them. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists