linux-kernel - Re: ver_linux: proposed implementation feedback request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:11:50 +0100
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>, richard@....at,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: ver_linux: proposed implementation feedback request

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:00:40PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Thanks very much for everyone's feedback.
> 
> Instead of flooding this mailing list with another bunch of ver_linux
> patches, I thought I would post another implementation, and see if you
> find any of the proposed changes worth submitting as a patch. I will
> be happy with whatever feedback you can give me. And we will leave it
> at that. Thanks.

We can't try to do a diff ourselves in order to try to determine if this
is "good enough" to take, sorry, that's not hoe kernel development
works.  If you don't think it's "good enough", then we sure don't :)

If you want to redo your series, to fix issues you have found, great,
please do so and resend them and we will be glad to review them, as we
have been doing.  We can work with that, not with a "raw" file like
this.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/