| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20151006081150.GA19014@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:11:50 +0100 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>, richard@....at, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Subject: Re: ver_linux: proposed implementation feedback request On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:00:40PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Thanks very much for everyone's feedback. > > Instead of flooding this mailing list with another bunch of ver_linux > patches, I thought I would post another implementation, and see if you > find any of the proposed changes worth submitting as a patch. I will > be happy with whatever feedback you can give me. And we will leave it > at that. Thanks. We can't try to do a diff ourselves in order to try to determine if this is "good enough" to take, sorry, that's not hoe kernel development works. If you don't think it's "good enough", then we sure don't :) If you want to redo your series, to fix issues you have found, great, please do so and resend them and we will be glad to review them, as we have been doing. We can work with that, not with a "raw" file like this. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists