lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJ1xhMU==KR5_c5MgdtNVkBEWgrc_27XdfnGqcFaD0hFi_XGwg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:28:54 +0300 From: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com> To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>, richard@....at, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> Subject: Re: ver_linux: proposed implementation feedback request On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:00:40PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> Thanks very much for everyone's feedback. >> >> Instead of flooding this mailing list with another bunch of ver_linux >> patches, I thought I would post another implementation, and see if you >> find any of the proposed changes worth submitting as a patch. I will >> be happy with whatever feedback you can give me. And we will leave it >> at that. Thanks. > > We can't try to do a diff ourselves in order to try to determine if this > is "good enough" to take, sorry, that's not hoe kernel development > works. If you don't think it's "good enough", then we sure don't :) > > If you want to redo your series, to fix issues you have found, great, > please do so and resend them and we will be glad to review them, as we > have been doing. We can work with that, not with a "raw" file like > this. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Understood. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists