[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mvmh9m48dpa.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:59:45 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@...sung.com>,
Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@...sung.com>,
Manjeet Pawar <manjeet.p@...sung.com>, pankaj.m@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
> enough for a couple of function calls".
The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ
stack.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists