lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:33:28 +0100
From:	Dave Martin <>
To:	Andreas Schwab <>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <>,,,,
	Akhilesh Kumar <>,
	Manjeet Pawar <>,
	Rohit Thapliyal <>,,

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <> writes:
> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
> > enough for a couple of function calls".
> The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ
> stack.

Whether it's valid to expect SIGSTKSZ to be big enough for that is

But I guess that SIGSTKSZ = MINSIGSTKSZ * 4 provides some insurance
against such assumptions (doubtless the python testsuite is not
the only code affected).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists