| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:52:24 +0200 From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@...sung.com>, Manjeet Pawar <manjeet.p@...sung.com>, Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@...sung.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, pankaj.m@...sung.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com> writes: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes: >> >> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition >> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need, >> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be >> > enough for a couple of function calls". >> >> The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ >> stack. > > Whether it's valid to expect SIGSTKSZ to be big enough for that is > debatable. This is tracked in <https://bugs.python.org/issue22503>. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@...e.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists