lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:49:02 +0100 From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com> To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@...sung.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@...sung.com>, Manjeet Pawar <manjeet.p@...sung.com>, pankaj.m@...sung.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:52:24PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com> writes: > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes: > >> > >> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition > >> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need, > >> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be > >> > enough for a couple of function calls". > >> > >> The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ > >> stack. > > > > Whether it's valid to expect SIGSTKSZ to be big enough for that is > > debatable. > > This is tracked in <https://bugs.python.org/issue22503>. Fair enough... Cheers ---Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists