| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:41:30 +0300 From: Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, dev@...k.org, hjk@...sjkoch.de, gregkh@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] uio: new driver to support PCI MSI-X On 10/06/2015 05:07 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 03:15:57PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> btw, (2) doesn't really add any insecurity. The user could already poke at >> the msix tables (as well as perform DMA); they just couldn't get a useful >> interrupt out of them. > Poking at msix tables won't cause memory corruption unless msix and bus > mastering is enabled. It's a given that bus mastering is enabled. It's true that msix is unlikely to be enabled, unless msix support is added. > It's true root can enable msix and bus mastering > through sysfs - but that's easy to block or detect. Even if you don't > buy a security story, it seems less likely to trigger as a result > of a userspace bug. If you're doing DMA, that's the least of your worries. Still, zero-mapping the msix space seems reasonable, and can protect userspace from silly stuff. It can't be considered to have anything to do with security though, as long as users can simply DMA to every bit of RAM in the system they want to. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists