[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444150089.5336.283.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:48:09 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/25] powerpc/8xx: also use r3 in the ITLB miss in
all situations
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:12 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 29/09/2015 02:00, Scott Wood a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:50:54PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > We are spending between 40 and 160 cycles with a mean of 65 cycles
> > > in the TLB handling routines (measured with mftbl) so make it more
> > > simple althought it adds one instruction
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> > > ---
> > > No change in v2
> > >
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/head_8xx.S | 15 ++++-----------
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > Why is this a separate patch from 1/25?
> >
> > Same comments as on that patch.
> >
> >
> Just because here there is no real need behind the simplification of the
> code, whereas the first one was a pre-requisite for the following patch.
> Should I merge them together anyway ?
If there's no real need, why do it? It's not really a major readability
enhancement...
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists