[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444150599.5336.289.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:56:39 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/25] powerpc/8xx: move 8xx SPRN defines into
reg_8xx.h and add some missing ones
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:35 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 29/09/2015 02:03, Scott Wood a écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:50:58PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > Move 8xx SPRN defines into reg_8xx.h and add some missing ones
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> > > ---
> > > No change in v2
> > Why are they being moved? Why are they being separated from the bit
> > definitions?
> >
> >
> It was to keep asm/reg_8xx.h self sufficient for the following patch.
Again, it would have been nice if this were in the commit message.
> Also because including asm/mmu-8xx.h creates circular inclusion issue
> (mmu-8xx.h needs page.h which includes page-32.h, page-32.h includes
> cache.h, cache.h include reg.h which includes reg_8xx). The circle
> starts with an inclusion of asm/cache.h by linux/cache.h, himself
> included by linux/printk.h, and I end up with 'implicit declaration' issues.
>
> How can I fix that ?
mmu-8xx.h should have been including page.h instead of assuming the caller h
as done so... but another option is to do what mmu-book3e.h does, and use
the kconfig symbols instead of PAGE_SHIFT.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists