[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151006165612.GA2752@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:56:12 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Kyle Walker <kwalker@...hat.com>,
Stanislav Kozina <skozina@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mmoom-fix-potentially-killing-unrelated-process-fix
On Tue 06-10-15 18:28:04, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> oom_kill_process() does atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users) to ensure that
> this ->mm can't go away and this is wrong, change it to rely on
> ->mm_count and mmdrop().
>
> Firstly, we do not want to delay exit_mmap/etc if the victim exits
> before we do mmput(), but this is minor.
>
> More importantly, we simply can not do mmput() in oom_kill_process(),
> this can deadlock if (for example) the caller holds i_mmap_rwsem and
> mmput() actually leads to exit_mmap(); the victim can have this file
> mmaped and in this case unmap_vmas/free_pgtables paths will take the
> same lock for writing. And at least huge_pmd_share() does pmd_alloc()
> under i_mmap_rwsem because VM_HUGETLB memory is not reclaimable.
Ouch, I have completely missed this during review! Thanks for catching
this. On the second thought it is clear now. We really want to pin the
mm_struct not the address space.
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 034d219..52abb78 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
>
> /* Get a reference to safely compare mm after task_unlock(victim) */
> mm = victim->mm;
> - atomic_inc(&mm->mm_users);
> + atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
> /*
> * We should send SIGKILL before setting TIF_MEMDIE in order to prevent
> * the OOM victim from depleting the memory reserves from the user
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - mmput(mm);
> + mmdrop(mm);
> put_task_struct(victim);
> }
> #undef K
> --
> 2.4.3
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists