linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 11:29:32 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Steve Rutherford <srutherford@...gle.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: fix edge EOI and IOAPIC reconfig race

On 13/08/2015 15:46, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> +	if (kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr(vcpu))
> +		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> +

The call to sync_pir_to_irr belongs more in vcpu_scan_ioapic, I think.

More importantly, I think that KVM_REQ_EVENT is a latent bug for
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_lapic as well, so the call to kvm_make_request should
go in vmx_sync_pir_to_irr or in a new kvm_sync_pir_to_irr wrapper.

> +			    (e->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG &&
> +			     kvm_apic_pending_eoi(vcpu, e->fields.vector)))

Should we test again here that kvm_irq_has_notifier(ioapic->kvm,
KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, index), to avoid unnecessarily marking other
edge-triggered interrupts?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/