lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56151BDF.8010504@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 16:19:27 +0300
From:	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>
Cc:	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/core: avoid 32-bit warning

On 10/7/2015 3:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The INIT_UDATA() macro requires a pointer or unsigned long argument for
> both input and output buffer, and all callers had a cast from when
> the code was merged until a recent restructuring, so now we get
>
> core/uverbs_cmd.c: In function 'ib_uverbs_create_cq':
> core/uverbs_cmd.c:1481:66: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>
> This makes the code behave as before by adding back the cast to
> unsigned long.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 565197dd8fb1 ("IB/core: Extend ib_uverbs_create_cq")
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> index be4cb9f04be3..88b3b78340f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ssize_t ib_uverbs_create_cq(struct ib_uverbs_file *file,
>   	if (copy_from_user(&cmd, buf, sizeof(cmd)))
>   		return -EFAULT;
>
> -	INIT_UDATA(&ucore, buf, cmd.response, sizeof(cmd), sizeof(resp));
> +	INIT_UDATA(&ucore, buf, (unsigned long)cmd.response, sizeof(cmd), sizeof(resp));

Would it make sense to cast inside INIT_UDATA() and not have callers
worry about it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ