linux-kernel - Re: CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1444358421.3232.78.camel@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 04:40:21 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks

On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 08:55 +1100, paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au wrote:

> >> Good to see that you agree ...
> > Weeell, we've disagreed on pretty much everything ...
> 
> Sorry I disagree: we do agree on the essence. :-)

P.S.

To some extent.  If the essence is $subject, nope, we definitely
disagree.  If the essence is that _group_ scheduling is not strictly
fair, then we agree.  The must be fixed bit, I also disagree with.
Maybe wants fixing I can agree with ;-) 

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/