[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5617D0D3.90208@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:36:03 -0400
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Koziolek <uwe.koziolek@...knee.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave
Jarod Wilson wrote:
...
> As Andy already stated I'm not a fan of such workarounds either but it's
> necessary sometimes so if this is going to be actually considered then a
> few things need to be fixed. Please make this a proper bonding option
> which can be changed at runtime and not only via a module parameter.
Is there any particular userspace tool that would need some updating, or
is adding the sysfs knobs sufficient here? I think I've got all the
sysfs stuff thrown together now, but still need to test.
>> Now, I saw that you've only tested with 500 ms, can't this be fixed by
>> using
>> a different interval ? This seems like a very specific problem to have a
>> whole new option for.
>
> ...I'll wait until we've heard confirmation from Uwe that intervals
> other than 500ms don't fix things.
Okay, so I believe the "only tested with 500ms" was in reference to
testing with Uwe's initial patch. I do have supporting evidence in a
bugzilla report that shows upwards of 5000ms still experience the
problem here.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists