[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5617D4FD.3030803@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 16:53:49 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locktorture: fix wrong parameter handling
Am 09.10.2015 um 16:46 schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:14:45PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Calling locktorture with a wrong parameter makes it
>> unusable:
>>
>> $ modprobe locktorture torture_type=help
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'locktorture': Invalid argument
>>
>> $ modprobe locktorture torture_type=spin_lock
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'locktorture': Device or resource busy
>>
>> $ dmesg
>> [...]
>> torture_init_begin: refusing spin_lock init: help running
>>
>> We can easily do the checking before call into the torture framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>
> Good catch, thank you!
>
> Could you please port this to rcu/next in the -rcu tree? Also, please
> capitalize the word following the ":" in the subject line, as in "[PATCH]
> locktorture: Fix wrong parameter handling".
Hmmm, seems that this is already fixed in rcu/next with
commit a36a99618b1adb2d6ca0b7e08e3a656a04e477fe
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 30 20:01:48 2015 -0700
Commit: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CommitDate: Tue Oct 6 11:28:44 2015 -0700
locktorture: Fix module unwind when bad torture_type specified
No need to respin a patch it seems :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists