[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151009232015.GC32536@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 00:20:15 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
kernel@...inux.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: add data pointer argument to read callback
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
> call to the read callback allowing simpler implementations thereof.
>
> In this patch, existing uses of this interface are simply updated
> with a null pointer.
This is a bad description. It tells us what the patch is doing,
(which we can see by reading the patch) but not _why_. Please include
information on why the change is necessary - describe what you are
trying to achieve.
I generally don't accept patches what add new stuff to the kernel with
no users of that new stuff - that's called experience, experience of
people who submit stuff like that, and then vanish leaving their junk
in the kernel without any users. Please ensure that this gets a user
very quickly, or better still, submit this patch as part of a series
which makes use of it.
Also, copying soo many people is guaranteed to be silently dropped by
mailing lists.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists