[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yw1x4mhzioxl.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 00:48:22 +0100
From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
kernel@...inux.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_clock: add data pointer argument to read callback
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:57:35PM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> This passes a data pointer specified in the sched_clock_register()
>> call to the read callback allowing simpler implementations thereof.
>>
>> In this patch, existing uses of this interface are simply updated
>> with a null pointer.
>
> This is a bad description. It tells us what the patch is doing,
> (which we can see by reading the patch) but not _why_. Please include
> information on why the change is necessary - describe what you are
> trying to achieve.
Currently most of the callbacks use a global variable to store the
address of a counter register. This has several downsides:
- Loading the address of a global variable can be more expensive than
keeping a pointer next to the function pointer.
- It makes it impossible to have multiple instances of a driver call
sched_clock_register() since the caller can't know which clock will
win in the end.
- Many of the existing callbacks are practically identical and could be
replaced with a common generic function if it had a pointer argument.
If I've missed something that makes this a stupid idea, please tell.
--
Måns Rullgård
mans@...sr.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists