linux-kernel - Re: 4.3 group scheduling regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151012072344.GM3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:23:44 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 4.3 group scheduling regression

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> (change subject, CCs)
> 
> On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 04:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > > Is the interactivity the same (horrible) at fe32d3cd5e8e (ie, before the
> > > load tracking rewrite from Yuyang)?
> 
> It is the rewrite, 9d89c257dfb9c51a532d69397f6eed75e5168c35.

Just to be sure, so 9d89c257dfb9^1 is good, while 9d89c257dfb9 is bad?

And *groan*, _just_ the thing I need on a monday morning ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/