[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151012081334.GA23595@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:13:35 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, lkp@...org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
0day robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [string] 5f6f0801f5: BUG: KASan: out of bounds
access in strlcpy+0xc8/0x250 at addr ffff88011a666ee0
* Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > * kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >>
> >> git://internal_mailing_list_patch_tree Ingo-Molnar/string-Improve-the-generic-strlcpy-implementation
> >> commit 5f6f0801f5fdfce4984c6a14f99dbfbb417acb66 ("string: Improve the generic strlcpy() implementation")
> >
> > Hm, there's no such commit ID anywhere I can see - did you rebase my tree perhaps?
>
> The test is for patch from LKML instead of git tree. That is, you patch
> is tested via applying it to a -rc kernel.
>
> Do you have a commit in your tree for this? We can test that to confirm.
Yeah, I just made a merge that includes just to strscpy() related bits:
b94371b0917a Merge tag 'v4.3-rc5' into core/strings, to pick up strscpy() fixes
(Note, it might take a few minutes for korg git mirrors to pick up this merge.)
All that tree does is that it makes strlcpy() use strscpy():
> > +size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t dst_size)
> > +{
> > + int ret = strscpy(dst, src, dst_size);
> > +
> > + /* Handle the insane and broken strlcpy() overflow return value: */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return dst_size + strlen(src+dst_size);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(strlcpy);
Do you see the same KASAN failure with that commit? If my analysis below is
correct, then the failure should go away.
Analysis:
The stack dump:
[ 22.242067] [<ffffffff8177a3e8>] strlcpy+0xc8/0x250
[ 22.242067] [<ffffffff8117b1b7>] cgroup_release_agent_write+0x67/0xa0
[ 22.242067] [<ffffffff81179925>] cgroup_file_write+0x75/0x180
[ 22.242067] [<ffffffff812af81e>] kernfs_fop_write+0x17e/0x210
[ 22.242067] [<ffffffff8121cf67>] __vfs_write+0x57/0x170
[ 22.242067] [<ffffffff8121d2bb>] vfs_write+0xeb/0x240
Implicates this strlcpy():
spin_lock(&release_agent_path_lock);
strlcpy(cgrp->root->release_agent_path, strstrip(buf),
sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path));
spin_unlock(&release_agent_path_lock);
where:
include/linux/cgroup-defs.h: char release_agent_path[PATH_MAX];
the target buffer sizing looks pretty robust (because simple).
And the input buffer side looks safe as well, by my reading:
'buf' here seems like a regular write operation, with a 'buf' and a 'size'
parameter - layered in through various layers of abstraction:
struct cftype::write, used in kernel/cgroup.c: cgroup_file_write()
- no size checks, no guarantee that we have a string
this is called via:
struct kernfs_ops::write via kernfs
which guarantees string termination in fs/kernfs/file.c's kernfs_fop_write():
buf[len] = '\0'; /* guarantee string termination */
ops = kernfs_ops(of->kn);
if (ops->write)
len = ops->write(of, buf, len, *ppos);
and that's a stable, private string local to the calling task.
So my guess is that this is the bug that got fixed by:
990486c8af04 ("strscpy: zero any trailing garbage bytes in the destination")
that that systemd passed in a string with leading whitespace, thus strtrim()
created an unaligned string, which caused the strscpy() to access past the end of
the kmalloc() buffer.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists