[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B256D81BAE5131468A838E5D7A243641D632216B@penmbx01>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:12:42 +0000
From: "Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
CC: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>,
"Desroches, Ludovic" <Ludovic.Desroches@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device
tree first
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com]
> Sent: 2015年10月12日 15:50
> To: Sylvain Rochet
> Cc: Guenter Roeck; Boris BREZILLON; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ferre,
> Nicolas; Desroches, Ludovic; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Yang,
> Wenyou; Wim Van Sebroeck
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device tree
> first
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> The rest of the series looks good to me, one comment below:
>
> On 08/10/2015 at 23:34:34 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> > watchdog_init_timeout function doesn't try to get the "timeout-sec" DT
> > property if timeout_parm is not zero. This change makes this DT
> > property working for the sama5d4 watchdog driver.
> >
>
> While I'm not sure of the feasibility, I think that the module parameter should
> override the DT property.
The patch should be right, the DT property overrides the module parameter.
If the DT property is not a valid value, it uses the default value, initialized with the module parameter at the beginning of probe.
>
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists