[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB3z_RrOKvQW5GiTEP2zqMaQ=EtpsqHB1GmUm-+D+12NM=USOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:36:24 +0100
From: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing
Hi Wolfram,
On 9 October 2015 at 22:16, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> As said to Kieran personally in Dublin, I want a verification that all
> binding methods still work, especially runtime instantiation for drivers
> without i2c_device_ids.
Ok, I should be able to find some time to look at that this week.
> Also, for the last patch, a verification should
> be done if the drivers i2c_device_id hasn't been used meanwhile.
I'll see what I can do ...
> I'd also like to see 'probe_new' instead of 'probe2' for the new function
> name. That should be it.
Ok, obviously this is only a temporary naming so I don't mind either way,
I'll do a rename for the next version
I've also just found a compile failure to fix up on !CONFIG_OF, this
can make its way into the respin.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfram
Regards
Kieran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists