[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160308042221.GD13692@x1>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:22:21 +0700
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@...il.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On 9 October 2015 at 22:16, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> >
> > As said to Kieran personally in Dublin, I want a verification that all
> > binding methods still work, especially runtime instantiation for drivers
> > without i2c_device_ids.
>
> Ok, I should be able to find some time to look at that this week.
>
> > Also, for the last patch, a verification should
> > be done if the drivers i2c_device_id hasn't been used meanwhile.
>
> I'll see what I can do ...
>
> > I'd also like to see 'probe_new' instead of 'probe2' for the new function
> > name. That should be it.
>
> Ok, obviously this is only a temporary naming so I don't mind either way,
> I'll do a rename for the next version
>
> I've also just found a compile failure to fix up on !CONFIG_OF, this
> can make its way into the respin.
I still don't see this upstream. What's the latest status?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists