[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bn6p7gwx.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:05:50 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> writes:
>>
>>> On a related note, can we *please* find a way to constrain namespace
>>> creation in a way that might satisfy the RHEL crowd?
>>
>> I am not certain to what you are referrring.
>>
>> As long as folks are willing to work with me I am happy to help design
>> and design something that makes things better for everyone. If someone
>> pushes hard, suggestes crappy patches, and does not listen to
>> constructive feedback I will shoot their patches down (especially when I
>> am sick and tired as I have been more than I would like this development
>> cycle).
>
> I think we should add some mechanism that will allow the right to
> create various namespaces to be constrained in a useful and usable
> manner. I'll start a new thread.
On the general principle that there is more attack surface, and attack
surface reduction is generally good I agree. I will await your follow
on thread when you are ready.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists