linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] scsi: ufs-exynos: add UFS host support for Exynos SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6499659.hVBcEphJIR@wuerfel>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:38:52 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	JBottomley@...n.com, vinholikatti@...il.com,
	amit.daniel@...sung.com, essuuj@...il.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] scsi: ufs-exynos: add UFS host support for Exynos SoCs

On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:49:39 Alim Akhtar wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..58aa714
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,463 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * UFS Host Controller driver for Exynos specific extensions
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> + * (at your option) any later version.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#ifndef _UFS_EXYNOS_H_
> >> +#define _UFS_EXYNOS_H_
> >
> > You have a lot of things in this header that are only used in one of the
> > .c files, so just move them there and make the header as small as possible.
> >
> hmm..these are mostly the registers defines, will removes the one which 
> are not being used as of now.
> Do you think I should sill move them to .c file?
> 

Yes. No need to remove the unused register definitions, just don't put
them into a separate header if they are only used in one place.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/