[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ1xhMXMcR_sxyVK3LHoRqa7uDYcr6g60uXmup4s2-YZjYu56A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:33:43 +0300
From: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
richard@....at, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] ver_linux: proc/modules, limit text processing to 'sed'
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
> <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com> wrote:
>> This patch is more of a personal preference, rather than a fix for a problem.
>
> Using the sed hold space isn't exactly easy to follow... if, unlike
> the other patches, there isn't some potential improvement over the
> status quo I'd suggest sticking with the original version.
>
> --
> Jim
Thanks for your feedback.
If the use of a shell variable to store the generated list of modules
be deemed more favourable than the use of the 'sed' hold space, may I
at least suggest either of the two approaches below:
Sorted list:
Y=`sort /proc/modules | sed 's/ .*$//'`
Unsorted list:
Z=`sed 's/ .*$//' /proc/modules`
The use of 'cat' in the context of the original implementation is redundant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists