[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013182338.GW3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:23:38 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 04:50:43PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> for (;; waitcnt++) {
> + loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD;
> + while (loop) {
> + /*
> + * Spin until the lock is free
> + */
> + for (; loop && READ_ONCE(l->locked); loop--)
> + cpu_relax();
> + /*
> + * Seeing the lock is free, this queue head vCPU is
> + * the rightful next owner of the lock. However, the
> + * lock may have just been stolen by another task which
> + * has entered the slowpath. So we need to use atomic
> + * operation to make sure that we really get the lock.
> + * Otherwise, we have to wait again.
> + */
> + if (cmpxchg(&l->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0)
> + goto gotlock;
> }
for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; --loop) {
if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked) &&
cmpxchg(&l->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VA) == 0)
goto gotlock;
cpu_relax();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists