linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for mic detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151014123014.GJ32409@x1>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:30:14 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	cw00.choi@...sung.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: arizona: Update DT binding documentation for
 mic detection

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:28:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > > > Providing Acks should not (and has not to my knowledge) be a binding
> > > > contract to continue providing Acks.  However, should more bindings be
> > > > submitted which appear as though they are related to a particular
> > > > maintainer, then sure, you'll be asked for your expert eye again.
> 
> > > It's a bit concerning when it seems like my review is becoming a blocker
> > > for something and I don't understand why.
> 
> > Not necessarily _your_ review.  Just someone, other than the
> > submitter, who I trust and knows about this stuff.  You just happen 
> > to tick those boxes this time.  Cross pollination and knowledge sharing
> > is one of the characteristics of MLs which I'm particularly proud of.
> 
> That was what it read like.
> 
> > > When your power budget is in the low double digit microamps and you're
> > > trying to respond promptly and reliably to rapidly changing and variable
> > > physical inputs it gets complicated.
> 
> > This is exactly why I asked you.
> 
> > Thanks for adding structure to my PoV. ;) 
> 
> So, a more specific question would have helped - just a general "any
> thoughts" type question isn't very clear.

To both comments -- this is how I phrased it:

"I either need an Ack from the DT folks, or at least someone who knows
about this stuff.  Mark perhaps."

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/