[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561E6FFB.3020005@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:08:43 +0100
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
steve.capper@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 02/11] arm64: Handle section maps for swapper/idmap
On 14/10/15 15:51, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>> +/* With 4K pages, we use section maps. */
>> /*
>> * ARM64 kernel is guaranteed to be loaded at 2M aligned
>> * address (as per booting requirements). Hence we can use
>> * section mapping with 4K (section size = 2M) and not with
>> * 16K(section size = 32M) or 64K (section size = 512M).
>> */
>
> That sounds much better. I hadn't figured out why myself, so thanks for
> the explanation :)
>
> However, there's one minor nit: the start of memory below the kernel is
> 2M aligned, but the offset means that the kernel itself is not loaded at
> a 2M aligned address.
Oh yes
>
> So how about:
>
> /*
> * The linear mapping and the start of memory are both 2M aligned (per
> * the arm64 booting.txt requirements). Hence we can use section mapping
> * with 4K (section size = 2M) but not with 16K (section size = 32M) or
> * 64K (section size = 512M).
> */
Will add this
Thanks
Suzuki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists