[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014151425.GA5041@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:14:52 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
steve.capper@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 02/11] arm64: Handle section maps for swapper/idmap
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:08:43PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 14/10/15 15:51, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>>>+/* With 4K pages, we use section maps. */
>
> >>/*
> >> * ARM64 kernel is guaranteed to be loaded at 2M aligned
> >> * address (as per booting requirements). Hence we can use
> >> * section mapping with 4K (section size = 2M) and not with
> >> * 16K(section size = 32M) or 64K (section size = 512M).
> >> */
> >
> >That sounds much better. I hadn't figured out why myself, so thanks for
> >the explanation :)
> >
> >However, there's one minor nit: the start of memory below the kernel is
> >2M aligned, but the offset means that the kernel itself is not loaded at
> >a 2M aligned address.
>
> Oh yes
>
> >
> >So how about:
> >
> >/*
> > * The linear mapping and the start of memory are both 2M aligned (per
> > * the arm64 booting.txt requirements). Hence we can use section mapping
> > * with 4K (section size = 2M) but not with 16K (section size = 32M) or
> > * 64K (section size = 512M).
> > */
>
> Will add this
Great.
FWIW, with the changes from this thread applied:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists