[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561E88A7.2090808@broadcom.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:53:59 -0700
From:	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
To:	Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>
CC:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/5] clk: iproc: define Broadcom NS2 iProc clock binding
On 10/14/2015 8:44 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:24:52PM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
>> Same as this patch. I thought device tree binding document should go
>> with the clock driver changes.
>>
>> Strictly speaking, device tree binding document should always go before
>> the driver changes. In the binding document the DT interface is defined,
>> then changes are implemented in the driver.
> 
> I split them off this way due to the clk maintainer not wanting to
> pull in any device tree changes.  Since the documentation is for the
> device tree enties, it makes logical sense to me that they be in the
> same device tree series.  If Stephen will pull these in with the clk
> changes, I am more than happy to have it done by him :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Jon
Yeah the clock maintainers do not pull in device tree changes like
*.dtsi and *.dts. But they do take changes including the binding
documents and clock driver changes. You can confirm with Stephen.
Thanks,
Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
