[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1971511.Ec7FdKlGRN@fb07-iapwap2>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:39:02 +0200
From: Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sakshi Bansal <sakshi.april5@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: nvec: fixed few coding style warnings
Am Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2015, 21:12:36 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 07:38:22PM +0530, Sakshi Bansal wrote:
> > Fixed allignmnet issues and block comments usage
>
> Split it apart by type of fix.
>
> > @@ -617,7 +618,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
> >
> > } else {
> >
> > nvec->rx = nvec_msg_alloc(nvec, NVEC_MSG_RX);
> > /* Should not happen in a normal world */
> >
> > - if (unlikely(nvec->rx == NULL)) {
> > + if (!unlikely(nvec->rx)) {
>
> This isn't right. You intented to say:
>
> if (unlikely(!nvec->rx)) {
>
> But even better to just remove the unlikely entirely.
>
> if (!nvec->rx) {
why? the "unlikely" is there to optimize a critical interrupt path.
Marc
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists