[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151015175136.GA28663@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:51:36 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] kmod: don't run async usermode helper as a child
of kworker thread
On 10/15, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 06:32:17PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > But I would like to keep "we do not want to pollute current->children"
> > because this the goal of the next cleanups.
>
> I don't mind it, it's just that it's not obvious _why_ we don't want to
> pollute it.
Well, this connects to the "Note:" part of the changelog, I don't
this the comment can really explain this.
But note that this fix is not enough in the long term _unless_ we
ensure that another workueue callback can not call kernel_thread()
without CLONE_PARENT. And this is what I am going to do.
Nevermind, this is (almost) off-topic right now. Please review V2
I'll send in a minute, I tried to update the comment/changelog.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists