lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:25:55 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, stern@...land.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] debugfs: Add debugfs_create_ulong() On 10/15, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14-10-15, 11:51, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 10/09, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > +struct dentry *debugfs_create_xlong(const char *name, umode_t mode, > > > + struct dentry *parent, unsigned long *value) > > > +{ > > > + return debugfs_create_file(name, mode, parent, value, &fops_xlong); > > > > Were you going to refresh this on my debugfs_create_mode() > > patches? Otherwise the patch looks fine to me. > > I thought you need to refresh your set as I posted this before you > have :) > :) Well this patch is creating xlong without any read-only/write-only ops, so it has the same potential problems as what the debugfs_create_mode() series was fixing. I'm fine either way though. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists