[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151015182840.GJ4558@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:28:40 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Magnus <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Linux-SH <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: add CS2000 Fractional-N driver
On 10/15, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> I understand. If my understanding is correct, user driver
> setups/enables this clock.
> If so, I still want this "clock-frequency" feature.
> because this clock requests other clock on my board.
> And requested clock requests this clock too.
> Thus, these clocks have dead lock on probe time
>
> cs2000: clk_multiplier@4f {
> ...
> clocks = <&rcar_sound 0>, ...
> ...
> };
>
> &rcar_sound {
> ...
> assigned-clocks = <&cs2000>;
> assigned-clock-rates = <24576000>;
> ...
> };
>
I think you're saying that the clock provider itself can't set
the rate with assigned-clock-rates? That isn't true, we should be
able to set the rate of the clock from within the provider node.
cs2000: clk_multiplier@4f {
assigned-clocks = <&cs2000>;
assigned-clock-rates = <24576000>;
};
The above should work.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists