linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:07:52 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
>>>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
>>>> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep
>>>> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is
>>>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
>>>> the test.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> v3:
>>>>  - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.
>>>> v2:
>>>>  - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart.
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next.
>>> If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1
>>
>> Yes please. :)
>>
>
> ok. Please rebase to linux-kselftest next and resend the patch.

Am I looking at the right tree? linux-kselftest#next doesn't appear to
have the s390 patch that was included in 4.3.

-Kees

>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
>
> --
> Shuah Khan
> Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
> Open Source Innovation Group
> Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
> shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978



-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/