[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151016071552.GB20310@visitor2.iram.es>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:15:52 +0200
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@...m.es>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/mpc5xxx: Avoid dereferencing potentially
freed memory
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:20:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 15/10/2015 08:36, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> >On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 07:56 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> >>Use 'of_property_read_u32()' instead of 'of_get_property()'+pointer
> >>dereference in order to avoid access to potentially freed memory.
> >>
> >>Use 'of_get_next_parent()' to simplify the while() loop and avoid the
> >>need of a temp variable.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> >>---
> >>v2: Use of_property_read_u32 instead of of_get_property+pointer dereference
> >>*** Untested ***
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Can someone with an mpc5xxx test this?
> >
> >cheers
> >
>
> Hi,
> I don't think it is an issue, but while looking at another similar
> patch, I noticed that the proposed patch adds a call to
> be32_to_cpup() (within of_property_read_u32).
> Apparently, powerPC is a BE architecture, so this call should be a no-op.
Sadly no more. 32 bit is BE only, but 64 bit can be either BEtter or
LEsser.
Gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists