[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444988979.12954.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:49:39 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/mpc5xxx: Avoid dereferencing potentially
freed memory
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 08:20 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 15/10/2015 08:36, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 07:56 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > Use 'of_property_read_u32()' instead of
> > > 'of_get_property()'+pointer
> > > dereference in order to avoid access to potentially freed memory.
> > >
> > > Use 'of_get_next_parent()' to simplify the while() loop and avoid
> > > the
> > > need of a temp variable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> > > ---
> > > v2: Use of_property_read_u32 instead of of_get_property+pointer
> > > dereference
> > > *** Untested ***
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Can someone with an mpc5xxx test this?
>
> Hi,
> I don't think it is an issue, but while looking at another similar
> patch, I noticed that the proposed patch adds a call to
> be32_to_cpup()
> (within of_property_read_u32).
> Apparently, powerPC is a BE architecture, so this call should be a no
> -op.
>
> Just wanted to point it out, in case of.
Hi Christoph,
I'm not sure I follow.
The device tree is always big endian, but of_property_read_u32() does
the
conversion to CPU endian for you already. That is one of the advantages
of
using it.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists