linux-kernel - Re: [BUG?] kernel OOPS at kmem_cache_alloc_node() because of smp_processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5620BBAE.1030800@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:56:14 +0800
From:	Gonglei <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>
To:	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"vdavydov@...allels.com" <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
	"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Lizefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	"lqymgt@...il.com" <lqymgt@...il.com>,
	"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>, "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
	"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] kernel OOPS at kmem_cache_alloc_node() because of smp_processor_id()

On 2015/10/16 16:08, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:49:36 +0800
> Gonglei <arei.gonglei@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015/10/15 22:39, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>>
>>>> [    0.016000] Call Trace:
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff810061dc>] dump_trace+0x6c/0x2d0
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff81394288>] dump_stack+0x69/0x71
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff81394308>] panic+0x78/0x199
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff81050fff>] do_exit+0x26f/0x360
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff813980a1>] oops_end+0xe1/0xf0
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff8102d955>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x155/0x230
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff813972ef>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff810ed93f>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xbf/0x140
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff811dc176>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x16/0x70
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff81019888>] native_send_call_func_ipi+0x18/0xf0
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff810783ee>] smp_call_function_many+0x1ae/0x250
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff810784b0>] smp_call_function+0x20/0x30
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff8101580a>] set_mtrr+0x5a/0x140
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff8138ef17>] smp_callin+0xf0/0x1b4
>>>> [    0.016000]  [<ffffffff8138efe9>] start_secondary+0xe/0xb5
>>>
>>> This happened during IPI processing?
>>>
>>>> crash> p cache_cache
>>>
>>> Arg. This is the SLAB allocator. You cannot enable debugging without
>>> rebuilding the kernel with CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG.
>>>
>>>> smp_processor_id() return 14, the CPU14, but the CPU14 is *stuck*, so cache=
>>>> p->array[14] is NULL,
>>>> why did this situation happen? And cause NULL pointer accessing? Is this a =
>>>> kernel bug?
>>>
>>> Its likely a bug in some obscure code in a driver that corrupted memory or
>>> messed up the way memory was handled. set_mtrr()? What was going on at the
>>> time? A special graphics driver being loaded? That could cause issues.
>>>
>>
>> It seems that the problem was fixed by Igor, right?
>> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/257
> That might help.
> "stuck" CPU14 means that master CPU has given up on the attempt
> to online AP and tried to clean it up from different maps
> *but* AP is still running and that may lead to an unexpected
> behavior.
> 
IIUC, this might be a sequence problem between BP processing and AP processing?

Regards,
-Gonglei

>>
>> Cced Igor Mammedov.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Gonglei
>>
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/