[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151016085808.GA32193@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:58:09 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Vincent Wan <Vincent.Wan@....com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ray.Huang@....com,
mcuos.com@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: i8042: add quirk to implement i8042 detect for AMD
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:27:00AM -0400, Vincent Wan wrote:
> Detecting platform supports i8042 or not, AMD resorted to
> BIOS's FADT i8042 flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Wan <Vincent.Wan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
> index c115565..bf3a605 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #endif
>
> /*
> @@ -1047,6 +1048,11 @@ static int __init i8042_platform_init(void)
> /* Just return if pre-detection shows no i8042 controller exist */
> if (!x86_platform.i8042_detect())
> return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
Why the vendor check if you're accessing a bit defined in the ACPI spec?
> + if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_8042))
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists