[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYfX9LqO8jjdhsp-MxJEqwHRudpjMqZhyvLbgxeGs9SSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:47:23 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
>
> Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
>
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
>
> CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
mailing list.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists