[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151016154723.GA23531@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 23:47:23 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] gpio: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
warnings
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 04:47:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:14 AM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c:151:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
> >
> > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> >
> > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> >
> > CC: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>
> This is confusing, I mix up the mails coming from my pushed git branches
> with this new stuff that is obviously checking patches I haven't even applied.
> It's better if these kbuild fixes are sent as Re: to the mail ID of the
> patch so it appears in the same thread as the offending patch on the
> mailing list.
Hi Linus, the patch email does not start with "Re:", however it does contain
In-Reply-To: <1444997709-57293-2-git-send-email-ck.hu@...iatek.com>
So it should show up in the same thread as this email?
[RFC 2/2] drm/bridge: Add I2C based driver for ps8640 bridge
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists