[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVCGkKsOOJLHBf-=OUpRrred4in_=bWxgXMZzVpK-NHgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:11:43 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/32: Fix entry_INT80_32 to expect interrupts to
be on
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:47:11AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> When I rewrote entry_INT80_32, I thought that int80 was an interrupt
>> gate. It's a trap gate. *facepalm*
Ingo, Thomas, don't apply this. It breaks the 64-bit build for stupid
reasons. I'll send a v2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists