linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151016055118.GR19018@linux>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:21:18 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories

On 15-10-15, 12:25, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Btw, does a Review-by have an implicit Acked-by?

I have attended a session at Linaro Connect where this was discussed
and the answer was:

Acked-by: is more of a general agreement from the person that he is
fine with the patch, but he might not have done a very careful review
and he isn't really responsible for the patch's content.

Reviewed-by: is a more strict tag and implies that the reviewer has
reviewed it at his best and he is as much responsible for the content
of the patch as the author.

> Kinda unrelated to this patch, but shouldn't this function undo the
> symlinks is has created so far before returning? Otherwise, we'd be
> leaving around broken symlinks.

Hmm, yeah. Will fix it separately.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/