[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4167825.7F75u7l572@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:16:45 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories
On Friday, October 16, 2015 11:21:18 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-10-15, 12:25, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Btw, does a Review-by have an implicit Acked-by?
>
> I have attended a session at Linaro Connect where this was discussed
> and the answer was:
>
> Acked-by: is more of a general agreement from the person that he is
> fine with the patch, but he might not have done a very careful review
> and he isn't really responsible for the patch's content.
>
> Reviewed-by: is a more strict tag and implies that the reviewer has
> reviewed it at his best and he is as much responsible for the content
> of the patch as the author.
That's a bit too much IMO. It means "I have carried out a detailed review
of this patch and haven't found problems in it." How much responsibility
that implies is not so clear (evidently, there are differing opinions
regarding that).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists