linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151028082849.GE30039@ubuntu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:58:49 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories

On 28-10-15, 09:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That's a bit too much IMO.  It means "I have carried out a detailed review
> of this patch and haven't found problems in it."  How much responsibility
> that implies is not so clear (evidently, there are differing opinions
> regarding that).

Right. I agree.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/